\rightarrowfill which you might
> > > be
> > > able to put into a frame of the desired width?
> > >
> > > \starttext
> > > $1\xrightarrow[none]{blah} 1$
> > > \par
> > > $2\xrightarrow[normal]{blah} 2$
> > > \par
> > > $
' and 'big'. You can 'kludge' these by extending the length of the text
using hard spaces. Alternatively there is \rightarrowfill which you might be
able to put into a frame of the desired width?
\starttext
$1\xrightarrow[none]{blah} 1$
\par
$2\xrightarrow[normal]{blah} 2$
\par
$3\xrightarrow[small
You can 'kludge' these by extending the length of the text
> using hard spaces. Alternatively there is \rightarrowfill which you might be
> able to put into a frame of the desired width?
>
> \starttext
> $1\xrightarrow[none]{blah} 1$
> \par
> $2\xrightarrow[normal]{blah} 2$
> \par
>
> On 1 Jan 2021, at 14:25, Johann Birnick wrote:
>
> Hi Aditya,
>
> I know the syntax, my problem is about the options for the length of the
> arrow.
>
> For example
>
> \xrightarrow[big]{abc}
>
> gives a longer arrow than
>
> \xrightarrow{abc
Hi Aditya,
I know the syntax, my problem is about the options for the length of the arrow.
For example
\xrightarrow[big]{abc}
gives a longer arrow than
\xrightarrow{abc}
According to different manuals also specific lengths should be possible. But
they don't work. I think it's a bug. (because
On Thu, 31 Dec 2020, Johann Birnick wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> \starttext
> $\xrightarrow[50pt]$
> \stoptext
>
> doesn't work. But it should, right? In the manual
>
> \starttext
> $\xrightarrow[50]$
> \stoptext
>
> is shown, but that doesn't work ei
Hi there,
\starttext
$\xrightarrow[50pt]$
\stoptext
doesn't work. But it should, right? In the manual
\starttext
$\xrightarrow[50]$
\stoptext
is shown, but that doesn't work either.
Best regards,
Johann
Hi all,
Nobody a clue on this?
Cheers,
Tim
On 22 Mar 2020, 12:14 +0100, Tim Steenvoorden ,
wrote:
> P.S. Same thing happens with math placed on top of arrows, like here
>
> $e,\sigma \xrightarrow{i} e',\sigma’$
>
> Like to fix that too.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
>
>
P.S. Same thing happens with math placed on top of arrows, like here
$e,\sigma \xrightarrow{i} e',\sigma’$
Like to fix that too.
Cheers,
Tim
On 22 Mar 2020, 12:10 +0100, Tim Steenvoorden ,
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’m trying to typeset a document using Lucida Type1 fonts. Primes ar
erman
Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] xrightarrow is not straight
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 10:42:01 +0200
"Joshua Moerman" wrote:
> Hi ConTeXt mailing list,
>
> I am using the extensible arrows and I am not really satisfied with
> the looks of
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 13:06:23 -0400 (EDT)
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> > Furthermore, the MP arrow can be tuned
> >
> > \startMPinitializations
> >
> > ahlength := .5EmWidth ;
> > ahvariant := 1 ; % dimpled straight
> >
> > \stopMPinitializations
> >
> > as can line widths, etc.
>
> Shouldn't we use
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, Alan Braslau wrote:
Hello,
You can also use MetaPost to render math stackers, rather than relying
on TeX constructs and any particular font.
For example:
\useMPlibrary[mat]
\definemathstackers
[mp]
[alternative=mp]
\definemathextensible [mp] [leftarrow]
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, Joshua Moerman wrote:
Another thing I noticed is that the line is not very consistent. This might
be a font issue (I am using Euler). Luckily, the inconsistent overlap is
barely visible when printed.
It is a viewer issue. It should also go away if you zoom the pdf.
Aditya
ou can see this in the attached picture: the left arrow is
> using \xrightarrow{\neq a} and the right arrow is using \stackrel{\neq
> a}{\longrightarrow}. I think the right one (with stackrel) looks more
> natural. Is there a way to setup the vertical spacing?
>
> Another thing I n
Hi ConTeXt mailing list,
I am using the extensible arrows and I am not really satisfied with the
looks of it.
The most important issue I have is that the vertical spacing is too much.
You can see this in the attached picture: the left arrow is using
\xrightarrow{\neq a} and the right arrow
ust loading the
>> fonts, as I believed you suggest in your mail, does not change anything:
>> the compilation with a 2017 mkiv still stops at “
>> 7~$\xrightarrow[none]$~6 progression ”.
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> this works with latest beta from 2017.
nge anything:
> the compilation with a 2017 mkiv still stops at “
> 7~$\xrightarrow[none]$~6 progression ”.
Hi Robert,
this works with latest beta from 2017.08.24 19:46:
\definefontfamily[mainface][rm][Verdana]
\definefontfamily[mainface][tt][Courier]
\definefontfamily[mainface][mm][Te
;>>
>>>> those commands now read:
>>>>
>>>> \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][Verdana]
>>>> \setupbodyfont[mainface, 10pt]
>>>> \starttext
>>>> \input zapf
>>>> \stoptext
>>>>
ConTeXt stumbles upon things like:
“ 7~$\xrightarrow[none]$~6 progression ”
The error message is: " ! Ma error: parameter \Umathquad\textstyle is not set."
How and where can I remedy this?
This means that you haven't defined a math font so you need something:
\definefontfamily[ma
;
>> Pablo
It does help but for the Law of the Conservation of Trouble (or Misery)
Having properly changed my font setup ConTeXt stumbles upon things like:
“ 7~$\xrightarrow[none]$~6 progression ”
The error message is: " ! Ma error: parameter \Uma
ate of the format in its third line:
>
> system > ConTeXt ver: 2017.07.17 00:20 MKIV beta fmt:
> 2017.7.26 int: english/english
>
> A minimal sample:
>
>\definefontfamily[mainfont][rm][MinionPro]
> \definefontfamily[mainfont][mm][Minion Math]
>\
al sample:
\definefontfamily[mainfont][rm][MinionPro]
\definefontfamily[mainfont][mm][Minion Math]
\setupbodyfont[mainfont]
\starttext
$A \xrightarrow{}{} B$
\stoptext
This should work fine in your computer with \setupbodyfont[pagella] or
no \setupbodyfont. The previous
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:31:33 +0200
>>> Mathias Schickel <m...@fa.uni-tuebingen.de
>>> <mailto:m...@fa.uni-tuebingen.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> $\xrightarrow{}{}$
>>>>
>>>> This throws errors. Any idea why?
>
On 7/26/2017 12:01 AM, Mathias Schickel wrote:
Am 22.07.2017 um 22:34 schrieb Alan Braslau <braslau.l...@comcast.net
<mailto:braslau.l...@comcast.net>>:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:31:33 +0200
Mathias Schickel <m...@fa.uni-tuebingen.de
<mailto:m...@fa.uni-tuebingen.de>>
> Am 22.07.2017 um 22:34 schrieb Alan Braslau <braslau.l...@comcast.net>:
>
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:31:33 +0200
> Mathias Schickel <m...@fa.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
>
>>> $\xrightarrow{}{}$
>>
>> This throws errors. Any idea why?
>>
&g
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:31:33 +0200
Mathias Schickel <m...@fa.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> > $\xrightarrow{}{}$
>
> This throws errors. Any idea why?
>
> > $\xrightoverleftarrow{}{33°C}$
>
> This does work. Sadly it is not the arrow I want to have.
MWE:
> $\xrightarrow{}{}$
This throws errors. Any idea why?
> $\xrightoverleftarrow{}{33°C}$
This does work. Sadly it is not the arrow I want to have.
Mathias
> Am 14.07.2017 um 21:25 schrieb Alan Braslau <braslau.l...@comcast.net>:
>
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:33:14 +0200
.pdf> Sadly I get errors
> if I use \xrightarrow (even this simple command does not work).
>
> Do extensible arrows still exists in ConTeXT and how can I use them?
>
> Best
> Mathias
$\xrightarrow{}
ows.pdf>
> Sadly I get errors if I use \xrightarrow (even this simple command does not
> work).
>
> Do extensible arrows still exists in ConTeXT and how can I use them?
>
Does no-one know if ConTeXt has extensible arrows? It would be great if at
least someone could te
Dear list,
I want to typeset an extensible arrow as described in this document:
http://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/matharrows.pdf
<http://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/matharrows.pdf>
Sadly I get errors if I use \xrightarrow (even this simple command does not
work).
Do extensible arrows
progressions
{\em e'}$\xrightarrow[none]${\em d'}, with {\em \sharp c''}; {\em
a}$\xrightarrow[none]${\em g}, with {\em \sharp f''}, %G\sharp,
2318 and {\em B}$\xrightarrow[none]${\em A} with {\em \sharp g'}.
%G\sharp.
2319
2320
2321
\placeexample[force
'}$\xrightarrow[none]${\em d'}, with {\em \sharp
c''}; {\em a}$\xrightarrow[none]${\em g}, with {\em \sharp f''}, %G\sharp,
2318 and {\em B}$\xrightarrow[none]${\em A} with {\em \sharp g'}. %G\sharp.
2319
2320
2321
\placeexample[force][fig:FrescCaprLaSolFaMiReUtfi]{Frescobaldi\index[Frescobaldi
}
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2.
\stopformula
\framed{ok}
\subject{math - subformula}
Expected formular numbers: (2a) and (2b):
\startsubformulas[eq:1]
\placeformula[eq:first]
\startformula
PM \xrightarrow R_{PM} \xrightarrow PM
\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:second]
\startformula
R_{PM} = \{ K, F, Z
Hi,
Some math symbols seem to be failing with the latest nightly build.
Minimal example:
\starttext
\section{blah}
A $a \xRightarrow b$ B.
\stoptext
I see this in the output:
ConTeXt ver: 2012.07.04 23:48 MKIV fmt: 2012.7.6 int: english/english
system tex error on line 3 in file
}{#8}{#9}
}\else \mathrel
{\math_arr...
\mathematics ...mmode #1\else \normalstartimath #1
\normalstopimath \fi
\445i:gives ...e \mathematics {\xrightarrow
apart from this IMHO very useful change (mapping to \int), maybe we should
create a unicode-math module which replaces some commands with symbols. i
find myself always using this for chemical and mathematical documents:
\catcode`→=\active
\def→{\xrightarrow}
\catcode`↔=\active
\def
and mathematical documents:
\catcode`→=\active
\def→{\xrightarrow}
\catcode`↔=\active
\def↔{\xleftrightarrow}
\catcode`√=\active
\def√{\sqrt}
Sorry for being a noob. I thought for the first three that is somehow
done already. If not, such a mechanism would indeed be useful.
PS: i recently posted
→{\xrightarrow}
\catcode`↔=\active
\def↔{\xleftrightarrow}
\catcode`√=\active
\def√{\sqrt}
Have a look at char-def.lua. All the symbol mappings are defined there.
Please feel free to complete the table (it is a boring and time consuming
process, and I have only managed to cover about half of the table
program that displays the mappings
in the char-def.lua since i can’t search for the symbols directly, have no
overview and editing would involve looking up the codes or names in a char
map, finding it in the file, and so on.
xrightarrow and friends are nice, because they adjust their length
.
\placenamedformula[one]{Der einfache Test}
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2.
\stopformula
\subject{math - subformula}
This works fine.
\startsubformulas[eq:1]
\placeformula[eq:first]
\startformula
PM \xrightarrow R_{PM} \xrightarrow PM
\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:second]
\startformula
R_{PM} = \{ K, F, Z, U, I
, align={right,middle,left}]
\NC PM \xrightarrow{aaa} \NC R_{PM} \NC \xrightarrow{bbb} PM
\NR[gleichung1a][.1]
\NC R_{PM} \NC = \NC \{ K, F \} \NR[gleichung1b][.2]
\stopalign
\stopformula
Can anyone help me to transform this to mkiv, please?
Thanks
P
this with the current beta
I have a real problem to transform my formula from mkii to mkiv. In mkii I
had following:
\placesubformulawithnumber[gleichung1]
\startformula
\startalign[n=3, align={right,middle,left}]
\NC PM \xrightarrow{aaa} \NC R_{PM} \NC \xrightarrow{bbb} PM
\NR[gleichung1a][.1]
\NC R_{PM} \NC = \NC
arrows like \xrightarrow as well.
\let\normaloverrightarrow\overrightarrow
\unexpanded\def\overrightarrow{\normaloverrightarrow}
And this fix helps there as well. Could this perhaps be fixed in general for
all extensible arrows?
Have you tried the new current yet? There was a whole bunch of extra
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
\xrightarrow{big superscipt}
Any suggestions?
Not completely identical, but similar.
The syntax can be made identical (even better) than that of amsmath.
Perhaps it syntax should be identical
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The syntax can be made identical (even better) than that of amsmath.
\def\xrightarrow{\dosingleempty\doxrightarrow}
\def\xleftarrow {\dosingleempty\doxleftarrow}
\def\doxrightarrow[#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow{#1}}
\def\doxleftarrow[#1
\xrightarrow{\doifnextcharelse[\noxrightarrow\doxrightarrow}
\def\xleftarrow {\doifnextcharelse[\noxleftarrow\doxleftarrow}
\def\doxrightarrow{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow}
\def\doxleftarrow {\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxleftarrow }
\def\noxrightarrow[#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow{#1
Hi,
Does ConTeXt have anything equivalent to xleftarrow, xrightarrow of
amsmath. Basically, I need a command that can do
A \xleftarrow[subscript]{superscript} B
should give
superscript
A --- B
subscript
and similar for xrightarrow, xleftrightarrow, xLeftarrow, xRightarrow
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
Does ConTeXt have anything equivalent to xleftarrow, xrightarrow of
amsmath. Basically, I need a command that can do
A \xleftarrow[subscript]{superscript} B
should give
superscript
A --- B
subscript
and similar
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
\xrightarrow{big superscipt}
Any suggestions?
Not completely identical, but similar.
Cheers, Taco
\def\domthxarr#1#2#3#4#5#6#7%
{\begingroup
\mathsurround\zeropoint
\setbox0\hbox{$\scriptstyle
\if0#1\else\mkern#1mu\fi
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
\xrightarrow{big superscipt}
Any suggestions?
Not completely identical, but similar.
Cheers, Taco
\def\domthxarr#1#2#3#4#5#6#7%
{\begingroup
\mathsurround\zeropoint
\setbox0\hbox{$\scriptstyle
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
\xrightarrow{big superscipt}
Any suggestions?
Not completely identical, but similar.
The syntax can be made identical (even better) than that of amsmath.
\def\xrightarrow{\dosingleempty\doxrightarrow}
\def\xleftarrow
51 matches
Mail list logo
